Back to: The Hermetic Laws & Quantum Physics
The Hermetic Tradition: Two Thousand Years of Inquiry
Thoth, Hermes, and Hermes Trismegistus
The figure at the center of the Hermetic tradition is a composite. In ancient Egyptian religion, Thoth was the ibis-headed god of writing, magic, mathematics, and wisdom. He was the scribe of the gods, the keeper of the divine records, and the mediator who weighed the souls of the dead. When Greek-speaking peoples settled in Egypt after the conquests of Alexander the Great in 332 BCE, they encountered Thoth and naturally identified him with their own Hermes. God of messengers, of boundaries, of travel between worlds, and of the spoken word. Over the following centuries, the two figures merged into Hermes Trismegistus, the Thrice-Greatest Hermes, a legendary sage who was said to have been philosopher, priest, and king, and to have authored a vast body of revealed wisdom on theology, alchemy, astrology, and magic.
The “Thrice-Greatest” epithet itself has been debated for centuries. Some interpreters read it as marking three aspects of his person, philosopher, priest, and king, the greatest of each. Others read it as pointing to three spheres of his wisdom, or to three incarnations of the same figure across time. The one thing contemporary scholarship is clear about is that Hermes Trismegistus was never a historical individual. He is a literary and religious creation, born from the collision of Egyptian and Greek religious imagination in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt.
The Corpus Hermeticum: The Philosophical Core
The Corpus Hermeticum is the foundational collection of texts in the Hermetic tradition. It consists of seventeen Greek treatises written between roughly 100 and 300 CE, presented in the form of dialogues between Hermes Trismegistus and his students, most notably his son Tat and his disciple Asclepius, who is in turn a Hellenized version of the Egyptian deity Imhotep. The opening and most famous treatise, the Poimandres, describes a visionary encounter between Hermes and a vast divine being called Poimandres, the “shepherd of men,” who reveals the nature of creation and the ascent of the soul.
The Corpus addresses a small number of very large questions. How did the cosmos come into being? What is the nature of the divine? What are human beings, and how did they come to be here? What is our proper relationship to the cosmos and to the divine? How does one live a life that leads to spiritual rebirth and, eventually, to a kind of divinization. The soul’s heavenly ascent to the source of all things? The texts present a distinctive fusion of Egyptian religious sensibility with Greek philosophical rigor, strongly influenced by Middle Platonism and Stoicism, with additional influence from Jewish thought and from the same religious ferment that produced early Christianity and Gnosticism. It is unlikely there was ever a well-defined Hermetic “church” or community. The Corpus is best understood as the literary expression of a philosophical and spiritual milieu.
For fifteen hundred years, most Europeans thought the Corpus Hermeticum was older than Moses and Plato. This belief was corrected in 1614 by the Swiss philologist Isaac Casaubon, who demonstrated through careful textual analysis that the Greek of the Corpus was Koine Greek of the Hellenistic and Roman periods, and that the texts were therefore first or second century products, not ancient Egyptian transmissions. Casaubon’s discovery did not destroy the tradition. It simply told scholars what they were working with. As the historian Brian Copenhaver and others have argued, the Corpus Hermeticum being a Greco-Roman production rather than an ancient Egyptian one makes it more philosophically interesting, not less. What we have is a vivid record of how the best minds of late antiquity were thinking about the nature of reality at a moment when Egyptian, Greek, Jewish, and early Christian ideas were all in contact.
The Emerald Tablet: The Cryptic Classic
The Emerald Tablet, or Tabula Smaragdina, is a very short text, roughly fourteen cryptic verses depending on the translation, whose influence on Western alchemy is difficult to overstate. Its most famous line, in one of its many English renderings, reads: “That which is below is like that which is above, and that which is above is like that which is below, to accomplish the miracle of the one thing.” From this line comes the popular axiom “As above, so below,” which has traveled far beyond the text that bore it.
The textual history of the Emerald Tablet is different from, and in some ways more complicated than, that of the Corpus Hermeticum. The earliest surviving versions are four Arabic recensions preserved in mystical and alchemical treatises between the eighth and tenth centuries of the common era, most notably the Book of the Secret of Creation attributed to Apollonius of Tyana and the Book of the Secret of Secrets. The Arabic versions are accompanied by a legend about the discovery of the Tablet, variously said to have been found by Apollonius in a vault beneath a statue of Hermes, by Sarah the wife of Abraham near Hebron, or by Alexander the Great at the oracle of Amon. Contemporary scholarship, following the work of E. J. Holmyard and Julius Ruska, generally accepts that the Arabic versions were themselves probably translated from a Greek or Syriac original, and that the original likely arose in Alexandrian Hermetic circles, possibly contemporary with the Corpus Hermeticum itself.
From Arabic the Tablet passed into Latin in the twelfth century, most likely via a translation by Plato of Tivoli in Barcelona around 1134 to 1145. The so-called “Vulgate” Latin version became the standard and was reproduced in the highly influential 1541 Nuremberg edition of Chrysogonus Polydorus’s On Alchemy. Through this channel the Emerald Tablet entered the bloodstream of European alchemy, where it became the foundational document of the art. Isaac Newton prepared his own English translation of the Tablet in the late seventeenth century, part of a much larger body of alchemical research, running to roughly a million words of manuscript, that he kept separate from his published scientific work. For Newton, alchemy was not a superstitious hobby. It was a parallel path to understanding the divine order of creation, continuous with his work on gravity, optics, and calculus.
The Emerald Tablet continues to matter because its central assertion, that there is a structural correspondence between levels of reality, is either the deepest possible statement about the nature of the cosmos or a misleadingly poetic metaphor. The entire thrust of this course is an extended attempt to figure out which.
The Hermetic Revival: Ficino to Bruno
The Hermetic tradition might have remained a curiosity of Byzantine monastic libraries were it not for an accident of Renaissance patronage. In 1460, a monk named Leonardo of Pistoia, traveling through Macedonia on behalf of the Florentine ruler Cosimo de’ Medici, acquired a Greek manuscript of the Corpus Hermeticum and brought it to Florence. Cosimo was at that moment funding the scholar Marsilio Ficino’s ambitious project of translating the complete works of Plato into Latin. When the Hermetic manuscript arrived, Cosimo ordered Ficino to set Plato aside and translate Hermes first. The Hermetic texts were believed at the time to be far older than Plato, and therefore more authoritative. Ficino’s Latin translation of fourteen of the Corpus treatises was completed and published in 1471. His student Lodovico Lazzarelli later added the remaining three.
The effect was seismic. For the next century and a half, the Corpus Hermeticum was one of the most read and most influential books in Europe. It shaped the thought of Pico della Mirandola, whose famous Oration on the Dignity of Man is thoroughly Hermetic in spirit. It shaped the philosophy of Giordano Bruno, who would die at the stake in 1600 partly for his defense of a Hermetic cosmology of infinite worlds. It shaped the Rosicrucian manifestos of the early seventeenth century. It shaped the hermetic-alchemical dimensions of Isaac Newton’s own thought, which recent scholarship, particularly the work of Betty Jo Teeter Dobbs, has made impossible to ignore. The Royal Society, founded in 1660, had deep informal connections to Rosicrucian and Hermetic circles. The origins of modern science are less separable from the Hermetic tradition than the standard textbook narrative suggests.
Casaubon’s 1614 demonstration that the Corpus was not ancient Egyptian wisdom slowed the Hermetic revival but did not end it. The tradition simply adapted. In the eighteenth century, it fed into Freemasonry. In the nineteenth, it fed into Helena Blavatsky’s Theosophical Society, into the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, and into the wider Victorian occult revival. In the early twentieth century, it fed into the American New Thought movement, which is where the Kybalion comes in.
The Kybalion in Honest Perspective
The Kybalion was published in Chicago in 1908 by the Yogi Publication Society, a press founded and operated by William Walker Atkinson. It was credited to the pseudonymous “Three Initiates,” and for most of the twentieth century its authorship was debated. The definitive scholarly account, Philip Deslippe’s introduction to the 2011 Tarcher Definitive Edition, establishes that Atkinson is almost certainly the sole author. The book fits Atkinson’s prolific output, his literary style, his publication practices, and his career pattern of producing works under multiple pseudonyms. Atkinson later published a follow-up volume, The Seven Cosmic Laws, shortly before his death in 1932, which rehashes much of the same material under a new title.
The word “Kybalion” itself does not appear in any historical Hermetic source. The mysterious ancient Hermetic text the book quotes throughout is a literary invention. This does not mean the book is worthless. It does mean we should be clear about what it is. The Kybalion is a twentieth-century synthesis that distills Hermetic, New Thought, and Western esoteric currents into a compact and accessible framework of seven principles: Mentalism, Correspondence, Vibration, Polarity, Rhythm, Cause and Effect, and Gender. Several of these principles map reasonably well onto ideas present in the authentic Hermetica, particularly the emphasis on the primacy of mind and the correspondence of levels. Others are more distinctively modern, reflecting the interests and assumptions of early-twentieth-century American esotericism. Scholars like Nicholas Chapel have pointed out that the Kybalion’s relative lack of interest in theology and its strong emphasis on individual “mental transmutation” stand in real contrast to the authentic Hermetica, where reverence for the divine and union with the divine are primary.
This course uses the Kybalion because its seven-principle structure is pedagogically efficient and because it is genuinely the form in which most modern seekers encounter Hermetic philosophy. We also read the Corpus Hermeticum in a serious scholarly translation, because that is where the original current actually lives. When we compare Hermetic principles to modern physics, we will use the Kybalion’s articulation as our convenient map while keeping in mind that the territory is considerably older and richer than any single 1908 book can contain.
The Seven Hermetic Principles
For reference as we move forward, the seven principles as the Kybalion articulates them are briefly as follows. A full module of the course is devoted to each. Do not try to master them now. Simply notice them.
| Principle | Axiom | What It Asserts |
| Mentalism | The All is Mind; the Universe is Mental. | The ultimate nature of reality is mind or consciousness. Matter, energy, and phenomena are manifestations of a universal Mind. |
| Correspondence | As above, so below; as below, so above. | Structural patterns recur across all levels of reality. The microcosm reflects the macrocosm; the inner world mirrors the outer. |
| Vibration | Nothing rests; everything moves; everything vibrates. | All reality is in motion. The differences between matter, energy, mind, and spirit are differences in mode and rate of vibration. |
| Polarity | Everything is dual; opposites are identical in nature, but different in degree. | Apparent opposites are the two ends of a single continuum. Hot and cold are both temperature; love and hate are both emotion toward an object. |
| Rhythm | Everything flows, out and in; the pendulum-swing manifests in everything. | Reality operates in cycles, oscillations, and rhythms. Every expansion is followed by a contraction, every ascent by a descent. |
| Cause & Effect | Every cause has its effect; every effect has its cause. | Nothing happens by chance. What appears as randomness is causation operating through channels not yet understood. |
| Gender | Gender is in everything; everything has its Masculine and Feminine Principles. | Creation at every level involves the interaction of two complementary principles — projective and receptive, active and gestative. |