- You must enroll in this course to access course content.
Back to: The Hermetic Laws & Quantum Physics
Module 0: Practices and Assessments
Practices: Preparing the Ground
This course is not purely intellectual. Every module pairs its conceptual content with practices designed to ground the ideas in direct experience. Module 0 is the only module where the practices are primarily preparatory rather than engaged with specific Hermetic or scientific content. They exist to clear the ground.
Practice 1: The Beginner’s Mind Inventory
Duration: 60 to 90 minutes of honest self-examination plus writing.
Before we start comparing Hermeticism and quantum physics, we need to know what you already believe and what you already resist. Unexamined assumptions will shape every judgment you make in this course whether you notice them or not. This exercise is not graded. It is for you. Nobody else will ever read it unless you choose to share it in the cohort discussion.
Sit down with a notebook or open document and answer each of the following questions at length. Do not edit for presentation. Write the truth as you currently understand it.
What do you currently believe about the relationship between ancient wisdom traditions and modern science? Describe your actual working position, not the position you think you should hold. If you mostly believe that ancient wisdom anticipated modern science, say so. If you mostly believe that modern science has rendered ancient wisdom obsolete, say so. If you hold a mixed or uncertain position, describe the mix.
What evidence or argument would change your mind, in both directions? What would it take to convince you that the Hermetic tradition has captured something real about the structure of reality? What would it take to convince you that it has not? If you cannot name specific things that would move you, your position is more emotional than epistemic, and it is important to notice that.
What biases are you bringing to this inquiry? There are biases in both directions. The bias toward validation wants the Hermetic tradition to be right because it would feel good to learn that it is. The bias toward dismissal wants it to be wrong because accepting it would mean revising too many other things. Which bias is stronger in you, and why? Be honest. Every human mind has biases. The goal is not to eliminate them. The goal is to see them clearly.
What is the hardest thing for you to hold with genuine uncertainty? For some people, the hardest uncertainty is spiritual. The thought that the wisdom traditions they love might be wrong in important ways. For others, it is scientific. The thought that reality might be stranger than the materialist picture allows. For others still, it is personal. The thought that their identity is bound up with a particular answer, so genuine openness feels threatening. Name your hard edge specifically. This is the place your growth will happen during the course.
When you have finished, set the document aside. Do not re-read it for six weeks. In Module 6 of the course, you will be invited to return to it and notice what has shifted. That comparison is often the single most valuable artifact the course produces.
Practice 2: The “Three-Level” Warm-Up
Duration: 45 minutes.
Find three examples of popular claims that link quantum physics to spirituality, consciousness, or manifestation. YouTube, Instagram, and the wellness sections of major bookstores are rich sources. For each claim, write a short paragraph that does three things.
First, state the claim in its strongest possible form. Apply the principle of charity.
Second, pin down what specific physics concept is being referenced and what it means in its native technical context. Apply the principle of precision.
Third, place the claim on the three-level framework: is it Level 1 genuine isomorphism, Level 2 deep analogy, or Level 3 false correspondence? Briefly defend the classification.
You will almost certainly find that most of your three examples are Level 3. Do not let that make you smug. Find at least one that you think is Level 2 or better and work to articulate why.
The skill this practice develops is discernment in both directions, catching both overclaims and underclaims. That discernment is what the rest of the course will rest on.
Practice 3: The Two-Texts Contemplation
Duration: 60 minutes, ideally in a single sitting.
Find a copy of the first treatise of the Corpus Hermeticum. The Poimandres, in a scholarly translation. Brian Copenhaver’s is ideal; G. R. S. Mead’s is freely available in the public domain. Read the full treatise slowly, without trying to analyze it. Let the strangeness of its visionary imagery sit with you. Notice what moves you, what repels you, and what you don’t understand.
Then find Chapter 4 of Erwin Schrödinger’s short book My View of the World, where he makes his argument that consciousness is singular and universal. Read it with the same slow attention.
Now sit for fifteen minutes in silence. Do not try to produce any particular thought. Let the two texts be in you together. When the silence ends, write a single page describing what happened in you. Did the texts feel like they were saying the same thing in different vocabularies, or different things in similar vocabularies, or something else you cannot categorize yet? There is no right answer. The purpose of the practice is to give your intuition a chance to speak before your analysis takes over. Your intuition will often point you toward questions your analysis should be asking.
Assessments
Worldview Inventory
Draw on your Beginner’s Mind Inventory from Practice 1 and expand it into a formal essay that addresses each of the following. Articulate your current position on the relationship between Hermetic wisdom and modern physics. Include an honest assessment of the biases you are bringing to the course. Identify at least three specific claims you expect to encounter in the course where you anticipate your bias will pull you toward either automatic acceptance or automatic dismissal. Conclude with a statement of what genuine openness would require of you in each of those cases.
Discussion Post
Identify one popular “quantum spirituality” claim you have encountered recently and analyze it briefly using the tools introduced in Section 5. Apply the principle of charity to represent the claim in its strongest form. Apply the principle of precision to pin down what specific physics concept it invokes. Identify any equivocations or genetic fallacies you can detect. Classify the claim on the three-level framework and defend the classification. Then engage substantively with at least two classmates’ posts. The goal is not agreement; the goal is the kind of honest dialogue this course will rely on for the next fifteen weeks.
❖ ❖ ❖
Your inner work is the most powerful thing you can do for the world.
– James Sageman
THE GREAT WORK PLATFORM
thegreatworkplatform.com
May you achieve all the abundance and joy you desire.